|
Postings on several FIREARM related message boards demonstrate that many individuals do not fully understand what is currently taking place here in Connecticut. There is a growing group of Connecticut Citizens who have made it their mission to demand that law enforcement understand and comply with the various Federal and State Constitutional Safeguards, existing State Statutes and Regulations.
QUESTIONS CURRENTLY EXIST ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUTES REGARDING GUN LAWS AND THE AUTHORITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AS IT APPLIES TO CONNECTICUT PERMITS TO CARRY PISTOLS AND REVOLVERS.
UNABLE TO RESOLVE THESE ISSUES, THE COURT WAS ASKED TO DECIDE WHAT THE LAW SAYS AND ALLOWS THE FOLLOWING COURT DOCUMENTS MAY HELP OTHERS UNDERSTAND THE ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED Complaint requesting a Declaratory Ruling Plaintiff's Objection to Motion to Strike Judge's Memorandum of Decision on Motion to Strike State's attempt to delay and increase costs Attorney Rachel Baird's response to State's Attempt to delay and increse costs
PLAINTIFF'S HAVE BEEN PROVIDED (BY COURT ORDER), WITH A MAILING LIST OF CONNECTICUT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES SO THAT THEY MAY BE NOTIFIED OF THIS ACTION. WHATEVER THE COURT DECIDES, THE DECISION WILL BE BINDING ON ANYONE WHO WAS PROVIDED NOTICE OF THE ACTION.
HOPEFULLY, THIS ISSUE WILL BE RESOLVED SOON CHECK BACK FOR ANY UPDATED INFORMATION ON THIS SUBJECT
|